Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Have you ever heard a fellow Christian state an unwillingness to accept something that is Scriptural because it does not make sense to them? They might argue that you have missed some critical piece of information. It just does not make sense, they will say.

On a forum recently, this type of debate occurred over the Doctrine of Predestination. A forum member actually began by stating that they can see how the Scriptures support the doctrine, but they simply can not accept it. After all, it doesn’t make sense to them.

I am going to make clear from the outset that I am not casting aspersions on this person’s character, intellect, or dedication to the Lord. I believe this person to be an intelligent, learned, and dedicated Christian. I only use their statement to introduce my argument.

Logic is a wonderful concept, and to me, and many other believers, it is the element at the heart of our faith. Our personalities seek some logical explanation for what we observe around us, and in the Scriptures. Once given this logical explanation, we are like the dying man in a desert who finds a pool of water. We are sated, and content. This is because logic is not the enemy of faith, but upholds the faith. Logic will only be detrimental to our faith when we make it so. The irony is that we actually violate logic at these times.

CS Lewis was a man who fell away from his faith early in his life, and then came back to it through the influence of his friends. His friends, including future Lord of the Rings author JRR Tolkien, were academics with Lewis at Oxford University. They used logic to convince their friend of the reality of the Lord. They argued that the commonality in myths, the sciences, everything about the human condition could not be properly understood without a God behind it.

Lewis’s conversion under their influence was interesting because it was not their sincerity, but the weight of their arguments which persuaded him. Also interesting to note was that Lewis was a type of wandering monotheist first, and a Christian second. Lewis recounts in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy, how he first came to accept that “God” existed, but still did not know which “God” he believed in. Slowly, he began to consider the alternatives, until he realized that the very Christian God he rejected when he was growing up was, indeed, real.

When I was a young college student almost a decade ago, I began to have doubts about my faith, and my politics. I feared that none of what I believed was true. Then I started to read Lewis’s books, and realized that what I wrestled with was true, and that it could be defended logically. I rejoiced that the Lord had proven Himself true through man’s foolishness as well as His sacred Word. I still wrestled with many issues though. All of the bloodshed in the Old Testament, the eternity of God, Hell and Justice, suffering in our world, and Predestination, just to name a few.

I so desperately wanted to prove how I could logically sort all of these areas out. With the help of the writings of Lewis and others, as well as my friends, I had some limited success. I could not settle everything though. This greatly troubled me until I began to realize that if I am to accept the Lord, I must accept Him wholly and without reservation. I let go of the need to understand, and embraced the imperative to accept. After all, if He is true, then everything He says is true, whether I understand it or not. To say that He is true, but only when I understand Him makes no logical sense.

This is where logic can be detrimental because of us. When we attempt to make logic explain everything, we essentially carry it too far. In such a situation, it will interfere with our faith. It will even cease to be logic any longer. We decide that the Scripture can only be true if we can understand it. We believe this is the only logical and sensible way to deal with such issues. We believe in the Christian God, and then state that only those things we understand are acceptable. The rest we will not accept, or will find some way to discount.

The problem with this is that the Lord says His whole Word is true, and must be accepted as such if we are to accept Him. To accept the Lord as logical under these conditions, but not His word, is the heart of illogic. For if we try to do so, we accept Him as a liar, and how can we trust anything He says. For that matter, to state that the truth of another person depends on our understanding is simply ridiculous. If I don’t understand how another person could have done some feat that they did, it doesn’t mean they did not do it. I can concentrate with all of my might, and they still will be as real as before and still have done their feat that I can not understand. My ability to understand does not alter reality. Once I admit that they are real, then I admit that every part of them is real.

In the end, none of these extra-Scriptural objections can work for the Christian. We must submit ourselves to Scriptural authority for our acceptance of the Lord to work. Either He is real and true, or He is not. We can not have it both ways.

Logic is a great tool for our limited human minds. It restored the faith of Lewis, myself, and so many others. It can also be a hindrance and a stumbling block in our lives. It is how we use it that decides which it will be for us.

Pride and Prejudice is a Classic. Of that there is no doubt, as it has stood the test of time for nearly 200 years, and been commented on and reviewed a multitude of times. I seriously doubt that there is little that I can say that is unique, original, or even all that helpful to anyone. I certainly won’t write the type of review that one of my friend’s on here wrote. I shall try, nonetheless.

The story is a truly intriguing love story. Two young, intelligent, yet naïve girls, Elizabeth Bennett and her sister Jane meet their potential suitors, Mr. Bingley and Mr. Darcy. Mr. Bingley and Jane hit it off right away, but Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth do not. At all. She is angered by his arrogance, which he has in ample supply; whilst he is disgusted by her tolerance and enabling of her horridly rude family, whom she certainly does tolerate and enable very much for the first half of the novel.

About midway through the novel, Elizabeth and Darcy have a confrontation, in which he professes his love to her, and she adamantly refuses to have anything to do with him. It was he who helped break up his friend Bingley and her sister Jane. He, who treated her, her sister, a friend of hers, Mr. Wickham, and people in general, so horridly, now wanted her hand? It disgusted her. He responded in a letter to her that her family warranted the ill manner in part. He also told her how Wickham betrayed his late father’s trust, and nearly ruined his teenage sister while trying to seduce her.

Much more happens during the novel, but that is not important to me for the purposes of this review. What is important is the lesson contained within the story, the lesson of compromise and changing one’s ways. Both Darcy and Elizabeth are right. Both need to change and both do change. Afterward, they fall in love. Jane and Bingley do get back together, and it seems so story book, but not so fast. In the last chapter, which acts as an epilogue of sorts, we learn how not everything is happy go-lucky. Yes, the two couples are happy, but not everything is peaceful as they have to suffer the discord of their extended relations, just as so many real-life couples do. This is so refreshing in our day of simplistic love stories, where everything is happily ever after, and there is little true conflict.

In the end, perhaps that is why the novel is still so popular. It is realistic, it tells a good story, it has characters, and it teaches a good moral tale, not to believe everything you hear until all of the facts are in, because you might make a serious misjudgment. And even if one is right, one can still have bad traits, and must be willing to change. This realism and moral teaching are what have made this book one of my favorite novels. I highly recommend it to anyone and everyone.

Let me take a moment to also recommend a brilliant movie adaptation of this seminal work. It is the 1995 BBC version starring Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle. It is a truly marvelous work that is faithful to the source material in a way few movies that I have ever seen have been. The movie has all of the elements of the book, sometimes in excruciating detail where you have a desire to magically reach into the screen and throttle some of the annoying characters. You can see the conflict, compromise, love, and happy yet realistic ending of the couple. No, you don’t get the epilogue to explain everything as they have it in the book, but it is hinted at enough. You get the sense that these two couples are happy, but part of a very dysfunctional family.

The acting is superb, the music incredible, and the characterization and pacing are almost exactly like those in the book. A brilliant movie that I also highly recommend.

There is a song I loved to hear and sing when I was a child. It had a chorus that rang clear with the words:

O Rejoice, in the Lord, He makes no mistake,
He knoweth the end of each path that I take,
for when I am tried, and purified,
I shall come forth as gold.

It’s strange, in a way, I never truly thought about that song until right at this very moment, as I type this. I have been thinking about a situation that two of my best friends, are going through. I hope this piece can bring at least some comfort to them. God bless them all. I wanted some way to write out how these friends’ situations made me feel, and even evaluate my own problems that I am enduring. I wrote a couple of weeks ago about how I felt because of these situations. My PTSD problems, my fear, anger, guilt over sin, and my loneliness, among other burdens. Why has a loving God allowed this to happen to me, and so many other veterans? Or anyone else for that matter? Why does He allow suffering at all in this world?

I honestly don’t know. The Father does not share that much of His plans with any one of us. I am left to contemplate, and wonder why He allows it to happen. Then this song comes into my head, and I realize that I might not know the precise reasons behind the Lord’s decisions, but I know some of the benefits behind them. Yes, I said benefits.

I am able to help others that I might not have been able to help otherwise. I know that the Lord loves each of us, and wants us closer to Him. I also know that even though the Lord could remove all pain and temptation from the world, He will not. Why? Because that is the opposite of love. We can only have true happiness if we can enjoy and communicate with the Lord, and we can only do so through conscious choice. To take away all of the problems of this world, is to take away our free will, and ability to enjoy Him. Yes, He draws us to Himself, I believe this, for I firmly believe in predestination. At the same time, we also, by making our choices in life, are able to enjoy Him. How is this balanced? Who knows? I know it is, though, because the Word tells me so.

Enjoying the Lord is not the only benefit of suffering, because if my life had gone more easily, I could still conceivably make the same moral choices, and enjoy the Lord. I could easily fulfill my purpose, as the catechism states. What is even more of a benefit, however, and a true blessing to me, is my ability to help others. I suffer, and can take the burdens of others, and help share them. I am truly a Christian, or “little Christ” when I do so. I follow in the Master’s footsteps. Isn’t that amazing? My suffering has a purpose. Two, in fact, that I know of, and perhaps many, many more. I can know the Lord, and be refined by Him, brought closer to Him, if you will. I also get to help others. How exciting can that be?

I hate to suffer. Everyone does. I hate watching other people suffer. I will not say that these things make up for it all, for myself, or anyone else. I don’t know, only each of us, in our communication with our Savior, can decide that. I can say that I am not grateful for my suffering. I will be honest about that. I am, however, grateful for the closeness to the Lord I experience as a result of it, and I am so grateful for the ability to be a blessing to others.

Along with the Apostle Paul and the Lord Himself, I pray that the burdens might be removed from me, but above all, no matter what, that God’s will be done. Suffering comes, but God is in control. He has already turned our burdens into blessings. All we have to do is grab onto them, and hold close to our Father, Who is ready to care for us. Isn’t that exciting?

Reading is a remarkable joy, particularly when one can learn a spiritual lesson from the oddest of places. I’ve learned a spiritual lesson from reading Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. That might very well sound quite silly. How can one learn a lesson from that? Well, even though I am only a little over a hundred pages through the book, I have, nonetheless, learned to remember the importance of not listening to gossip.

I can already see that things will not be as they appear for Darcy and Elizabeth. I do not believe Wickham. I think that he is lying. If I am right, then that is a grand moral lesson. Too often in life, we all gossip and talk about other people. What does this do for us that is profitable? Nothing. Does it ever result in good? No. Either we are wrong, or we push people further into a bad situation, or we hurt people. Sometimes, we do all three of these.

In the book, I hope that Elizabeth chooses Darcy in the end. Even though he is a bit of a pompous oaf, he has many good qualities that peek out from below the surface, sort of like a Diamond in the Rough, as they say. If she were to choose Wickham, who I believe to be lying, then that would be a tragedy. It would be her deluding herself into believing gossip,which is against her rational nature to believe, but all too sadly in line with human nature to entertain and engage in.

In real life, how many people have we hurt by gossip and idle words? The Bible states that gossip divides people. (Proverbs 16:28) and is one of the worst sins listed in the Bible. (Romans 1:29-32) Gossip can ruin lives, and end relationships, often before they can really begin. I learned a great spiritual lesson from Jane Austen through a practical example of the dangers of gossip. Jane Austen, Apologist. Who’d have thought it?

Friends are truly wonderful to have. They give you advice, and they often point out to you what is good about your life, when you only focus on what is bad. Case in point are some emails and comments I’ve received about yesterday’s entry in the blog.

I can argue, and do argue, from what I know of other people, that my sins are ones that none of my close friends have committed. However, as they would undoubtedly point out to me again, as they did after last night’s entry, we have all made mistakes, and all of us have missed the mark of faithfulness to the God of the universe. I have done both good things, and evil things.

How can this be? How can I look to the faults that other Christians have committed as proof I’m not the worst sinner ever, and that God forgives; and yet at the same time, look at these same people as proof of the relationship I can have with the divine if I only but continue to work at it. It is simple. Both statements are true. They have sinned, so they are  not so far advanced over me as I made them to be, yet at the same time, they are advanced in the things of God. I can learn from them, and learn to do one thing they seem to be able to do. To forgive myself.

It’s funny, in a way, because the God of the universe, the perfect, Holy, Omnipotent, and all other types Infinite God of the universe, has forgiven me, and yet, I can not forgive myself. The guilt is something that I must work through. I try my hardest to do so. I am hopeful that I can succeed. I have many goals in life, including meeting a virtuous young Christian woman, and getting married, and eventually having children. None of this is possible, however, until my life is straightened out. Therefore, I must work on this.

To my friends, please pray for and help me to forgive myself, and live better for the Lord, and pray for me that I deal better with the various issues I have from other situations such as Iraq. You all mean the world to me. God bless.

Four Easy Steps to Make a Difference in the Lives of Those Deployed to Combat

“We support the troops.” That statement is often bandied about. Many of us say these words automatically, almost like a child who recites his bed-time prayers – not thinking about what he is praying. Many people who “support the troops” won’t even think about what that truly means.

As I was writing down some notes and sentiments a few days ago, while reflecting on the recent 234th birthday of the Army, I found myself contemplating what supporting the troops really entails. Supporting the troops means being aware and meeting some of their needs and desiring the best for them. How can we do this? It seems like a daunting challenge for civilians to find ways to help these brave warriors a thousand miles away. “What can I possibly do?” many people ask.

When I was deployed to Iraq, I was under a great deal of strain. I missed my family and friends greatly. I was always in danger, constantly driven to work longer hours than ever before, and secluded within a small area that I could not leave, except while on mission. I would often get depressed and wonder what I’d done wrong to deserve being stuck where I was. Most of my fellow service members had similar thoughts and reactions. Eventually, this depressed state caused us to care less about living and stop being cautious and observant of the rules we needed to follow for our safety. This was dangerous for all of us. Service members who could not cope with the strain of the situation, killed themselves.

Even the smallest amount of attention and support from the home-front can make a world of difference to our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines who are over seas. The truth of the matter is: they are giving their all not because they enjoy war, but because they have been asked to serve and protect our freedom. Any amount of help we can give to make their lives easier is appropriate thanks to those who have sacrificed so much. In fact, it might even help save a life. We find ourselves back to the question of how we can help. Below, I have outlined a few practical steps we can take to make life a little easier for our troops.

1. Send care packages and letters.

Care packages and letters are great to receive. When I was in Iraq, it was wonderful to receive a letter from the states. A small amount of money spent can even have more impact. Snacks, hygiene supplies, DVD’s, and books are all great items to send. When it comes to snacks, beef jerky and sunflower seeds are always good, as are granola bars, cookies, and crackers. Hygiene supplies are easy to send such as razors, tooth care supplies, soap, laundry detergent, and shampoos. DVD’s and books should be mainly funny (comedies) or action-oriented in nature. They will serve to distract troops from the dangers of combat and how much they miss their family and friends.

2. Donate phone cards.

Donate phone cards to the USO, VFW, American Legion, and other veterans’ services organizations. Being away from home is perhaps the hardest part of any deployment – harder even than actual combat. All of the environmental strains and pressures troops contend with are heightened by a sense of isolation that only deepens as the deployment continues. The ability to talk to family and friends is probably the single greatest morale booster to the troops. AT & T phone cards are the best to send. This way, even if the MWR free phones are not available, the troops can use the AT & T call centers at whatever base they find themselves.

3. Volunteer at your local USO, particularly if you live by an airport that has a USO office.

Often when troops are traveling to and from home and the war zone on R & R leave, they will be stuck at the airport for a while. This is especially true of those soldiers who are waiting to go back to their respective theaters of combat. They are made to stay at USO’s while they await their movements onto their flights back to the theater. The moods of these young men and women are often quite somber as they contemplate returning to the war zone. Volunteering by serving food, snacks, repairing computers, or just helping soldiers relax as they wait for their flights, goes a long way toward making extremely difficult situations a little more tolerable and pleasant.

4. Support and thank those troops that you know.

Most of us know of a soldier somewhere, whether from a local school, church, job or our own family. Take the time to learn that person’s name, mailing address, email address, where he is deployed, and other pertinent family information. Send him regular letters or emails, keep track of where he is deployed and check up on his family. The impact you make on a serviceman or woman’s moral by showing that you care for them or their loved ones is incalculable.

The pressures our brave men and women must endure for our country’s security and freedom are immeasurable. Any steps we can take to make their time overseas a little easier, is the least we can do to repay them for their service to our country. There are many things you and I can take to support our troops and almost anything we do will be deeply appreciated.

The above steps are a few of the many ways we can support our brave men and women in service. Remember, they are sacrificing their lives for us and any gesture of gratitude, no matter how great or small, can and will make all the difference in the world to them.

That’s definitely, I imagine, one of the stranger titles people have seen. It’s the most appropriate title that I can think of right now, though. There are several events and items that have coalesced to cause me to choose to write this piece. First of all, there was feeling down, and finding comfort from God from new friends that I’ve made in the past couple of weeks. Secondly, there is this song that I heard, “Does Anybody Hear Her” by Casting Crowns. The video is beautiful, and speaks to the fact that too many Christians are hypocrites who do not do their best to help hurting people. Instead, we shun them.

In my own life, I’ve experienced this. I’ve been rejected because of what people percieve as my faults. But I’ve also been embraced by others, not because of myself, but because the Lord chose to use them to reach out to me.

How often in life do we stand by and watch as others suffer? How often do we, as the video says, shun them because of their “scarlet letter”? How often do we hide behind the  “shadow of our steeple”? How often do we judge people from behind our steeples?

I really don’t know. I do know that the Lord rarely comes to us in a Touched by an Angel type of mystical way. He most often comes to us through others. Have you ever had a friend who has shown you so much love, caring, and acceptance, that you almost thought it was too good to be true? That there was something beyond ordinary about it? It was, for people. There was. That was the Lord showing you love. It’s not magic. It’s enchanted, as JRR Tolkien would say. It’s the simple act of the Lord bending down to our level. Think of that, a cosmic being bending down to our level. As CS Lewis pointed out, it is an amazing idea to consider.

Yet, the Lord makes it clear that He does not come down by force, He looks for this willing to show His love. When we refuse to show love to others, we are not the vessels the Lord can use to help those hurting people. Could the Lord force his way in a mystical Touched by an Angel type of way? Could He simply force us to be nice? Well, yes, He has that power. No, however, He can’t use it, for it is against His nature. He has established rules for how these things will be governed. As a God of Order, He must abide by His own rules. Think of when Jesus said that He could not do miracles in a town, because of that town’s unbelief. When we refuse to reach out to others, we sin. Oh, how we sin. How many souls shall the Church have to give account of to the Lord someday? How many have been damned to Hell because of our unkindness? I shudder to think of it.

Yet, when we do reach out to others in Godly kindness, what is the result? The result is that of the Lord using us to help others in such a dramatic, wonderful, (yes, I will even say it) supernatural way. At the end of the video for “Does Anybody Hear Her”, this woman reaches out to the hurting girl, and now she is starting to get it together. Some people might say, it’s not that sudden. I say from personal experience, that yes it is. The girl will not be instantly okay. With continued assistance from the other girl, however, the Lord will little by little mend her heart. I have had difficulties that I have little desire to go through here. They are not over at all. I honestly don’t know if they ever will be. I know that friendship has helped to ease some of the pain of it all.

God is in the small things. He is in the great things, as well. He chooses to reveal himself through the small things. If we need comfort, we should go to the small things, such as a simple hello, or a conversation. If we want to give comfort, all we have to do is to extend the same to others.

The recent decision of the Obama Administration to lift certain restrictions on stem cell research has some far-reaching imports. I profoundly disagree with the decision. I will not go into why at this time, though. Instead, I believe it is important to point out a very troubling attitude that was prevalent in the president’s announcement. The attitude that progress and science are all-important, and morality is not.

President Obama stated in his announcement:
It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it’s inconvenient – especially when it’s inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda – and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology….we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology….

The troubling part is the constant refrain to science vs. ideology. Despite the president’s lip service to the importance of not breaking certain troubling moral boundaries, it is clear that he views religion and ethics as fields lesser than science. In short, the president views them as “ideology” that must be relegated to a secondary role, and dismissed if it contradicts “science”.

The danger in this new policy is the danger that is inherent in the soul of man, a danger that has been born out in the bloodbath that was the history of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1890′s, eugenics, which had gained ground in Europe, began to gain ground in America. The great promise of eugenics was to purge society of those who were not a benefit to it. This was not done for selfish reasons alone, as many sometimes suggest. This was done out of a very misguided sense of love for the most part. The people who can not cut it need to be weeded out, that way there will be less and less of them as time goes on, and eventually none. We will care for them now, and slowly perfect society.

The result of all of this was, whether by force or deception, the sterilization of the mentally retarded, minorities, the poor, and eventually the Native American population. The freedom to decide for themselves what to do was removed from them, for their own good and the good of society. That is a horror enough, to be sure, but it was not to be the end. Eventually the call to euthanize these same groups rose up. It was in part this impulse that drove the Nazi ovens. To be sure, Hitler’s motives were undeniably racist and evil, but his supporters, whether in Germany, Europe, or America (and yes, he did have them in America), were influenced by this altruistic notion. The notion that we will help them for their own good by first restricing their liberty, and then eventually putting them out of their misery.

I would personally question the economic and scientific knowledge of the socialist and eugenecist project of the Nazi’s, and other supporters of eugenics.  They were blinded by ideology. The point is that everyone is blinded by their personal beliefs, whether you call it ideology, relgion, or just their supposed realism. We all have a deep moral worldview, even the most amoral of us. We are all governed by our values. The supporters of eugenics were for the most part not mustache twirling villains, they were people who honestly thought they were doing the right thing, but without some moral compass to guide them (whether it be religion or some secular moral vision) the evil they engaged in was inevitable.

Science, as well as economics, and any other field, must be limited by a moral vision that repects the individual, his relatinship before God, and does not subject him or her to the needs of the collective. Religion serves this role most often, but even if one is not religious, the observance of the principles of religion is important. These principles are the foundation of what we call Western Civillization. They are important, because when observed, they have protected our civilization from great moral decay; and when ignored, our civilization has committed true depravities.

That is why the president’s statements are so troubling. They reveal the utopian vision to make man perfect. The truth of religion that man can not be made perfect, and that the individual is precious before God, and must be protected, is of no importance to this utopian vision. The president believes that by ignoring the tenets of traditional morality, and deifying science, he can make not just a better world, but a perfect one. He is wrong on both counts, as a rudimentary study of history will attest. For all of our sakes, I hope that enough people realize that in time.

Recenly, as I was looking through NarniaWeb, I noticed the blog of a fellow NarniaWebber. The address for the article I am referring to can be found at http://www.faithfusion.net/?itemid=479#nucleus_cf

The topic from the piece that I wanted to discuss has to do with confronting evil. In this case talking about the refusal of many Christians to acknowledge evil, and the further refusal to fight against it. This refusal is something that I would expect from non-Christians, but for Christians to have this attitude is truly disheartening.

Christians are raised on the belief that there is an absolute evil, and that evil is based in the rebellion of the Devil, which in turn was furthered and brought down on Man by the rebellion of Adam and Eve. The Devil encourages and tempts man in his unbelief, which is not hard because man is perpetually evil. Man, in the end, desires to go against the natural order of the universe. This desire was gleaned from the originator of sin, the Devil. Because of this evil of rebellion against God, we are all condemned to death and Hell, but through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ on the cross, we are redeemed if we accept Him.

This notion that God has instituted a natural order in the universe, and that there are moral imperatives that all men and women know and follow has been passed down through the ages in the form of natural law/natural rights theory. Evil is a rebellion against God and the natural order that He has instituted in our world.

This is why it is so stunning to me that many Christians refuse to acknowledge evil. Our very faith records the ultimate battle between good and evil, yet there are some in the Church who declare that movies such as The Dark Knight, or even Lord of the Rings, are too dark. Life is not like that, they say. I would challenge such people to go work in a hospital or rescue mission in many of the slums in our largest cities, and tell me life is not like that. Or go talk to a member of the police, fire department, military, FBI, CIA, ATF, or other intelligence/federal law enforcement agencies, and tell me life is not like that. Is the evil as colorful as in such movies. Well, no, it isn’t. Is it just as evil as these fictional monsters and supervillains. Yes, it is.

In Iraq, soldiers in my unit and others had to contend with the constant threat to our safety, where vicious monsters would try to kill us in the most horrific ways possible. Beyond that, is the willingness to condemn women and girls to death, rather than have a male or a foreigner treat them.

You might say, well that is based on a religious belief, that is not the same as these movie villains. The fact is that it is the same. A nihilistic religious vision, and a nihilistic secular vision are the same in the end. The only difference is that in the one case, chaos is glorified to worship a twisted conception of god, while in the other case, chaos is glorified to worship a twisted conception of society and one’s role in it. Evil does exist. The sooner Christians accept this, and stop clucking about how such things should not be shown, the better. Such things must be shown, and the sooner the better. This truth can not be ignored. Evil is not just a spiritual phenomenon. It is a very real eathly phenomenon, and a very real physical threat to all of us.

The second issue is the related concept that Christians ought not get involved in such areas because they are inherently base and immoral. I disagree. The Scriptures are quite clear on the responsibilities of government:

“Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God….for it (the government) is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.” Romans 13:1 and 4, (parenthetical comments, my own) New American Standard Bible

The government’s role is to protect the citizenry from attacks by foreign powers, and from violence from criminals within the citizenry itself. The issue of what the government can and can’t do is simple. Can the government kill in execution for murder? Yes. Can it kill in revenge, or just on a whim, without proper deliberative processes (trials)? No. In The Dark Knight, Batman does not kill, but he does beat up and torture bad guys. He even lies to protect the city. Commissioner Gordon goes along with it. Batman is not part of the government, but he is still the only one who is willing to go along with doing what is necessary to preserve order and prevent chaos and evil. Am I saying that all of his tactics are good, and should be emulated per se in real life? No, I am not. Some must, however, and that is where we get to the crux of the matter.

There are Christians who want to keep children from facing evil, or engaging in careers where they might have to confront evil. Such jobs are dirty sometimes, they say. Well, they are right. But, in a strange way, I would argue that the dirtiest jobs are the noblest of all. These jobs where people walk a fine line, and constantly try to protect others, while risking their lives, and sometimes their very moral being itself. Such people need prayer. Not condemnation.

Such jobs must also be filled by Christans as well as the non-Christians. The light of the Lord is needed to light the way. Will it still be dirty, yes, but if Christians do not get involved, they can hardly complain about how much dirtier still such jobs get to be.

As Christians, we must acknowledge the existence of evil, and fight against it, because it does exist. Whether we like it or not. Maybe we can keep dirty business from becoming even dirtier.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.